Macro photography pushes your camera to the edge of what it can do. The closer you get to your subject, the harder it is to keep details sharp, handle movement, and get enough depth of field to show what matters. Your gear can either make this easier or much harder, and the choice of system has a huge impact on how you work.
Coming to you from Emilie Talpin Photography, this practical video lays out why a Micro Four Thirds camera is such a strong option for macro work. Talpin explains how the smaller sensor gives you more depth of field at the same aperture and magnification, so you don’t have to rely on focus stacking nearly as often. When you’re shooting subjects that refuse to stay still, that difference matters. With apertures like f/16 or f/22, you can often get enough detail in a single shot. That means fewer missed opportunities and less time glued to a computer later. Talpin contrasts this with what she sees in workshops, where full frame shooters often struggle to keep tiny details in focus on subjects like refractive surfaces.
The video also digs into magnification, another critical advantage of Micro Four Thirds systems. Because of the 2x crop factor, a 60mm macro lens acts more like a 120mm on full frame. That puts more detail straight into your frame without the need to crop in post. Talpin points out how this makes it easier to see and capture small features in the field, especially with subjects like water refractions or insects. Instead of relying on heavy cropping later, you get the shot directly in camera, which preserves image quality and speeds up your workflow. This translates into more usable images with less editing time.
Size and weight are another area where Talpin sees Micro Four Thirds standing out. The smaller bodies and lenses make it easier to spend long hours outside without fatigue. She shares her own experience with the OM System OM-1 Mark II, describing how comfortable it feels in the hand compared to bulkier full frame setups. She compares it to wearing the wrong pair of shoes: if the grip doesn’t feel right, you’ll notice it after hours of shooting. Lighter macro lenses like the 30mm and 60mm add to the benefit, making the whole system easier to carry and handle. If you’ve ever hesitated to bring gear into the field because of weight, this is where the Micro Four Thirds format really earns its place.
Talpin also emphasizes stabilization and computational features that further boost the system’s value. Strong in-body stabilization means she can shoot handheld even at high magnifications without relying on a tripod. That mobility helps her move around subjects and adjust angles quickly. On top of that, the OM System cameras include features like in-camera focus stacking and high-resolution modes, which save time in post-processing and open up creative options. These tools can help you produce images with more detail and scale than you might expect from a smaller-sensor camera. Check out the video above for the full rundown from Talpin.







The advantages of DOF, size, weight are even more for cameras with sensors smaller than MFT.
Man I've shot everything from m4/3 to medium format and gotta say this is absolutely correct. M4/3 is PERFECT for macro work. I've found that M4/3 cameras (especially Olympus) have features that can benefit macro photography that you won't find on any other camera. They seem to be the only genre of cameras actually trying out new things besides Pentax of course. Everything is more affordable and sooo much more light weight. Especially if you're going to be lugging gear out to remote places. If macro was my main gig I'd own nothing but M4/3 gear.
In my case I feel much more comfortable holding a larger full frame body than a om-1. My hands feel cramped and uncomfortable. Automated focus stacking is great and now many more cameras have it. Added depth of field is a bonus but on the other side the diffraction limit is lower with a smaller sensor, so f16-22 may not be that sharp.
"diffraction limit is lower with a smaller sensor, so f16-22 may not be that sharp."
OOOF. I did not know that would happen on smaller sensors. Thanks for the info!